2.17.2009

In Praise Of Transgressions - WSJ

An interesting article from last week's Wall Street Journal about celebrity and our collective defense mechanisms. Perhaps all the Christian talk of "cosmic accounting" (substitution, propitiation, expiation, etc) isn't so far-fetched after all... A few excerpts:

Americans who like their dudgeon high and their blood boiling have worked themselves into a tizzy now that the news about Alex Rodriguez's steroid use has broken. The Yankee third-bagger's fall from grace, coupled with Olympic hero Michael Phelps's shocking admission of drug use and Tom Daschle's unseemly failure to pay his income taxes has apoplexy aficionados digging into the record books to remember a time when the American people had worked themselves into such a sustained, unmediated level of fury at once-revered public figures. How could they do it? We all keep asking one another. How could they be so stupid? How could they be so callous? And what kind of message does it send to the kids?

---------------

No public misdeed is too insignificant to earn our limitless fascination. Actor Joaquin Phoenix caused a stir this week following his appearance on the "Late Show with David Letterman." His principal offenses: chewing gum and maintaining a generally unresponsive demeanor throughout what proved to be a very painful, unproductive interview. (Mr. Letterman finally said, "Joaquin, I'm sorry you couldn't be here tonight.") And thus ensued a heated debate about whether Mr. Phoenix was acting, on drugs or just spaced out. Meanwhile, in a nearby solar system, the stock market dropped another 400 points.

These misbegotten individuals, their names dragged through the mud, can perhaps be forgiven for thinking that their miscues might have generated slightly less rancor given the perilous circumstances the nation currently finds itself in. After all, virtually concurrent with the disclosure of their misdeeds, the global financial system has imploded, the housing market has collapsed, both Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers have ceased to exist, unemployment has reached a level not seen in decades, millions of citizens approaching retirement age have seen their 401(k)s pulverized, and some of the most illustrious banks in American history seem poised to be taken over by the federal government.

----------------

What accounts for the shock that greeted the Phelps miscue, the anger that greeted the Daschle disclosure and the rage that continues to be directed at Rodriguez? For one, we the public think that we know these people because we see them all the time on TV. Because of this, they root us in the here and now in a way run-of-the-mill white-collar villains do not. They have violated an old-fashioned code of morality that we can all understand in a way we cannot understand a $50 billion Ponzi scheme or the fact that Iceland has put out a "Closed for Business" sign.

Another explanation for the ire directed at this trio of sacrificial goats is that we enjoy having baseball players and swimmers and pols in our crosshairs, and we aim to keep them there. This is not so much out of a desire for retribution as a desire for therapy. Athletes, movie stars, pop singers and politicians are part of a consistent narrative that runs through our lives. They reach out and touch us, but we also reach out and touch them. This makes them entirely different from thugs like Bernard Madoff, a parvenu scumbag none of us had even heard of six months ago. When our luminaries, our heroes and heroines disappoint us, we feel that we have the ability to punish them because we know where they will feel it most. And so we keep on punishing them. Over and over and over, day after day after day. Until somebody really awful like O.J. Simpson comes along to redirect our rage elsewhere.

From the therapeutic perspective, this is vastly superior to ranting about the latest depredations of Wall Street. No matter how much we froth and foam, none of us can lay a glove on imperious figures like John Thain or the haughty fat cats who run the auto industry or the inept regulators who let Mr. Madoff run wild in the first place.
----------------
Another reason public outrage has reached such a stratospheric level is because Messrs. Phelps, Rodriguez and Daschle are people who can actually hear our derision, people it is possible for the public to punish.

Labels: , ,

7 Comments:

Blogger JDK said...

great post Dave!

Maybe this is the new incarnation of the burden of being a public figure?

February 18, 2009 at 2:30 AM  
Blogger dpotter said...

"I care very little if I am judged by you or any human court; indeed I do not even judge myself. My conscience is clear, but that does not make me innocent. It is the Lord who judges me." St. Paul (1Cor 4:3-4)

February 18, 2009 at 5:00 AM  
Blogger Matt Stokes said...

Tricky, tricky business. I agree that we have been too quick attack these men and women (though I'm a Red Sox fan and I admit a personal animus towards Sen. Daschle and his politics).

I do think the frustration among the averge Joe comes in because if most of us had lied on our resume (as A-Rod essentially did) or committed borderline tax fraud (a la Tom Daschle), we'd be in trouble unlike any these folks will experience. Having said that, Christians in particular should be slow to such vitriol. Consequences must occur from time to time, I understand (it was only right that Daschle resign from his post), but Dave is right - let's leave the rancor to someone else. Those of us who have been set free from the law should know better.

February 18, 2009 at 8:54 AM  
Blogger Caroline Henley said...

That Joaquin Phoenix clip is really funny.

February 18, 2009 at 10:15 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I think the supposed public "rage" directed toward these celebrity hero-villains is for the most part a creation of the mass media and that people don't actually care that much, but do love to talk about it a great deal. Most of us have far too many problems of our own to get that worked up, in any real sense, over any of these people. Much of this is shallow e-mail condemnation-rage that is gone with the next news cycle. So I would hold off on any amateur psychologist, broad-brush mass analysis.

February 18, 2009 at 10:48 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

So I would hold off on any amateur psychologist, broad-brush mass analysis.

that's not a very helpful comment. . .

February 18, 2009 at 10:54 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sorry, Anonymous, if my comment was not helpful. The article just seems to me to do its own "finger pointing" (i.e. let me tell you what's wrong with you, clueless American Public) I can't escape the irony of that attitude, which seems to condemn the "law" in others while using it against them all the while. If that is "grace", I'll pass.

February 18, 2009 at 7:05 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home